Start code, mine first goes to center, touches plate, then goes to x0 and y-max with z on the plate before going into autolevel. I will run another and see how that goes. I used G90 X0 Y0 as mentioned in this thread, but exporting the g-code from MC I think it should be G1 X10 Y200 put before turning off the steppers with M84.
#Cura 15.04.6 download code
My fix for end code to push the bed out to get to part didn't work. Too bad you can't define top and bottom separately like in MC. I finally found the Bottom/Top thickness (mm) setting and changed it from 0.6 to 1 to get 5 solid layers on top and bottom instead of 3. I do like Cura better because of that, but not sure why MC does that. The bottom printing from MC is odd that the width of the lines are so big and the gap. Now I can preheat, push the bed out and spay it. I didn't know what pronterface UI was, but wow, that helps a lot to have on. I know I could change the temp down to what MC has by default, but didn't know if there would be an advantage of the new higher temps in Cura. My pics has the MC print on left and Cura print on right. Not sure what the higher temp gives me, but I will have to wait a lot longer before trying to pop off. The sides look the same either in Cura or MC. I squished the right half and that is why the right top has bigger gaps than the left half. I tried that with the new temp settings in Cura and the part was still very soft. So I got used to waiting just about 30secs before trying to pop the print using MC. since there are slight gaps on the left side of the top of Cura print and the MC has fine gaps as well.Ħ) Heat diff. Maybe I should cal my extruder to make sure I'm not under extruding. Maybe I need to add another top layer in the settings? It's just the default so far. I added a compare below as well but the right half gaps are my fault (see later note). Not sure if that was from the higher temps or not. See diff in pics.ĥ) top final layers seemed to print messy when bridging the gaps of the 20% infill pattern. Is that because of the diff in slicing? Maybe MC using lower res on first layers. I got the same with MC.Ĥ) bottom looks so much better using Cura. See pic below.ģ) Is there a setting change or something to keep it from leaving boogers on the plate when autolevel? I always wait until it checks the back points and scrap off the middle boogers so not to mess with print. Seems to have been printing a bit high on first level, but bottom of part looked good. I only got one instead of 3 even though I changed the setting in Cura like Mike mentioned. I may need to change my z-offset a bit since it didn't create the outer skirt lines as nice as MC. Is there a way for it to do both at once? What's the benefit doing it separately? Can you also do a preheat manually? I would preheat bed and then spray some 80s hair spray on the platform prior to print.Ģ) autolevel worked great. Thanks for that everyone.ġ) heats the bed then the extruder and not both like MC. Already found the answer to the end gcode to move the bed out like MC did when the print was finished so I didn't have to reach behind. First I exported the cal cube from MC (couldn't find where MC keeps the preloaded stl library files on my PC) and printed it off. I know it's not a great quality PLA, but what I have for now. Still using up the blue PLA that came with the printer. Maybe someone can explain that diff to me. I wanted to change the temp for the bed and extruder to match MC's default of 210C for extruder and 50C for bed, but kept the 220C/70C setting that was there for PLA. I have a new R1 and still new to all of this and wanted to see what was different from MC. Once you are done, put the profile you have made into resources/settings.Īctually, I did some poking around on Cura's github and there is a way, its just not "automated"
#Cura 15.04.6 download generator
You can either use the generator here or you can use this as a template. Click to expand.Actually, I did some poking around on Cura's github and there is a way, its just not "automated"
0 kommentar(er)
